7.PhysicsOfIdeas.pdf

(550 KB) Pobierz
ChangeThis
Y
Save to disk
Hide/Show menus
D Measuring the Physical Properties of Memes E
A Physics of Ideas
“One of the main obstacles to productivity today is the
growing problem of information overload. Information
overload results because we lack effective tools for
automatically organizing information collections into
meaningful and relevant chunks.” continued >
by Nova Spivack
| iss. 7.03 | i | U | X | + |
942418082.019.png 942418082.020.png 942418082.021.png 942418082.022.png 942418082.001.png 942418082.002.png
ChangeThis
Introduction
This paper provides an overview of a new approach to measuring the physical proper-
ties of ideas as they move in real-time through information spaces and populations
such as the Internet. It has applications to search, information filtering, personaliza-
tion, ad targeting, knowledge discovery and text-mining, market research, trend
analysis, intelligence gathering, organizational behavior and social/cultural studies.
This article is reprinted
with permission from
the author from :
One of the main obstacles to productivity today is the growing problem of information
overload. Information overload results because we lack effective tools for automatical-
ly organizing information collections into meaningful and relevant chunks. For many
years I have been thinking about a new way to approach this problem that is based
on some ideas in classical physics. For quite some time I didn't say anything about it
because it seemed like good material for a patent, but now I've decided it would be
better to just put this in the public domain since I would rather have it be prior-art
than patented by anyone. This is fundamental and useful and everyone should benefit
from it.
In this article I propose the beginning of what might be called "a physics of ideas."
My approach is based on mapping classical physics to memes that move through
information spaces over time. The key to this is to measure the momentum of ideas
as they move through space and time, and thus the momentums of documents that
contain them. This provides a means to quantify the strength and trajectory of ideas
as they move through a given corpus (and by inference, through the populations that
create and consume the documents in that corpus) — and this enables us to start
applying classical physics to empirically measure and understand the dynamics of
| iss. 7.03 | i | U | X | + |
2/36
942418082.003.png 942418082.004.png 942418082.005.png 942418082.006.png
ChangeThis
ideas that are shaping our world. In other words, we can start to objectively analyze
interactions between ideas as well as the impact that various ideas have on people,
organizations and events in the "real world" and in turn the impact that those things
have back on ideas.
Ideas are perhaps the single most powerful force shaping our world today, other than
the climate. Humanity's behaviors are nothing but the results of various ideas — the
phenotype of the ideas that are actually at work in the population at a given time.
This is true for any organization, and even for individuals — ultimately much if not
all of their behavior is conditioned by their ideas. So if we can form a science of ideas
that enables us to begin to quantify and analyze their dynamics, we can start to gain
new insights into human behavior and the "hidden" forces shaping our world today.
My approach is to find a way to map what is going on in the realm of ideas to existing
methods in classical physics — I want to make it possible to treat ideas as ideal par-
ticles in a Newtonian universe. It may then be possible to use the wealth of techniques
that physicists have developed for analyzing the dynamics of particle systems to un-
derstand the dynamics of ideas within and between individuals and groups.
BACKGROUND
But first some background about how I came up with this idea…In 1993 I worked as
an analyst at Individual, Inc., back in the pre-Web days. In that job I was part of a
sophisticated information filter. Individual published filtered personalized newsfeeds.
They aggregated content from thousands of sources and then filtered it into strategic
newsfeeds tailored to the interests of their customers. You may have used Newspage
| iss. 7.03 | i | U | X | + |
3/36
942418082.007.png 942418082.008.png 942418082.009.png 942418082.010.png
ChangeThis
or Heads Up, in the past. Chances are, if you did, I was your analyst. The way that the
Individual system worked was that first a set of AI agents did a first pass on the in-
coming content to sort it into buckets. These buckets were routed to a team of human
analysts with expertise in the relevant fields. The analysts would then go through the
articles in the buckets to prioritize them, remove duplicates or items that had come
through in previous articles as well as items that did not belong, and add in any items
that should be included.
I want to make it possible to treat ideas as
ideal particles in a Newtonian universe .
What this meant in practical terms for me as an analyst was that every night from
about 8 PM until 1 AM I had to personally read through around 1600 news articles. My
beat was emerging technology, software, broadband, online-services, multimedia and
satellite applications, so I enjoyed it (yes, I am a serious news hound!). But still it was a
challenge to keep on top of such a fire hose. Not only did I have to figure out what was
important and how to prioritize it, but I also had to remember if I had ever seen and
published anything about a given subject before in the previous year. By trial and error I
evolved a solution to this problem. In summary, what I realized was that whether or not
something is relevant is much more subtle than merely keyword matching!
A good example can be found in nature — specifically frogs. Frogs have interesting
visual systems. They are tuned to focus on things that move. They are most sensitive to
size and velocity, but they also notice changes in velocity. Things that are small and that
| iss. 7.03 | i | U | X | + |
4/36
942418082.011.png 942418082.012.png 942418082.013.png 942418082.014.png
ChangeThis
don't move are not of particular interest to them. Things that move in erratic ways are
most interesting. Humans are slightly more sophisticated — we notice momentum, a
measure of the "mass" or "size" of things and the way they change over time.
Every night from about 8 PM until 1 AM , I had to personally
read through around 1600 news articles .
What I realized at Individual back in 1993 was that the way I figured out what articles
to prioritize was not so different from how a frog finds flies to eat — but more so-
phisticated. I realized that I filter information according to the momentums of ideas (or
"memes") — how the various memes in the articles I was reading were moving through
space and time in the culture I lived in and the communities I was interested in.
Here is a formula that provides an overview of my heuristic for filtering news articles:
Rank of item (such as an article) in a list = function of (keyword relevancy of item to
query, reputation of publisher or source, date of publication, relevancy of source to
query, 'document momentum' of item with respect to memes in corpus).
The last item, "document momentum" is the key to it all. The document momentum
is a measure of the cumulative real-time momentum of the memes that occur in the
document. This requires some explanation. The rest of this article describes how to
measure the momentum of a meme and compute the document momentum for a
document, and how this can be useful for a number of information tasks.
| iss. 7.03 | i | U | X | + |
5/36
942418082.015.png 942418082.016.png 942418082.017.png 942418082.018.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin