Harmonic Continuum Theory - The New Physics and Cosmology by Andrew Hennessey.pdf - Andrew Hennessey - morefaya2006

HARMONIC CONTINUUM THEORY.

The New Physics and Cosmology

Andrew Hennessey

PART 1. The old Paradigm.

It would be fair to say that for the last hundred years, the human

race has not made any progress in the understanding of life and

the Cosmos. Even copious technology, which has greatly

improved our understanding of the particle physics that runs it

all, has remained paradox ridden and incomplete. Thus far, it is

only by the greatest bit of luck that the misled thankfully haven't

succeeded in completing a black hole of any magnitude in the

lab.

Hollywood and the film industry has ceaselessly presented The

Teutonic eggheads of post World War II and made the Germanic

contribution to science legendary. The popular understanding of

the mad scientific genius always has a German accent: Einstein,

Von Neumann, Heisenberg, Max Plank, etc. The only problem

with this myth of supremacy is that it has led us all nowhere for

70 years and is a load of old baloney.

Einstein and the establishment agreed in the late 1930's, in

Copenhagen, that having a paradox at the heart of physics was a

good idea. Also, that the speed of light should be fixed at a

constant and that there was no ether or grainy bits in space that

would hold traveling photons up. Logically therefore the sky

should be white at night noted Olbers c.1920.

A paradox suggested the establishment. Olbers Paradox.

An entire century of human evolution has been lost by that

nonsense and denial.

Did you know that the reason why the sky isn't white at night is a

real paradox and scientific mystery? Because if Albert Einstein

and cronies have rationally decided, that there is nothing holding

the passage of light through the cosmos up (i.e. that there is no

ether), then they would also expect the sky to be completely

white at night. The dark night sky disproves Einstein’s Theory of

Relativity.

We know the sky is black at night and that was the paradox

noted by Olbers in 1920. Something is holding up the light to

make it dark, and that whole paradox is really proof for the ether

that Einstein and the establishment wanted so badly to ignore.

Of course people will answer to Olbers that the Universe has

been measured finite, but how could we ever rationally say that

when we have never measured the Dark Matter within it.

We build TV's and computers or any other black box, yet our

understanding of the vital processes at the heart of it all is

actually less than nothing. If we look closely, and we have to

(because no one wants to admit it to you), there are paradoxes

not just at the heart of physics, but at the heart of everything we

think we know about the universe.

Our logic isn't logical, [Göedel], our philosophy of arithmetic is

about nothing in particular, [Frege] and our physics is an

ignorant tragedy. [Superstring theory]. The odd thing is that the

thirty or so really crippling paradoxes are all really the very same

one, but just dressed up differently in the specialist language of

each discipline. That is, every paradox could be solved by taking

into account its interaction with the bigger picture. The very

opposite of how every scientist today has been trained to think.

Coming back to physics and cosmology, (because we have to. .

.well somebody does anyway) our particle physics today is a

gargantuan monstrosity of mathematical nonsense that will

never produce any results. It’s called super-strings, and at the

heart of all the real problems of 21st century academic physics,

is the in-built failure of Einstein and his theories of relativity.

How much irrational nonsense and social engineering has been

written on the back of the problems of uncertainty posed by the

mathematical nonsense and paradoxes in physics? The

nonsense of quantum physics is being used to justify all sort of

impulsive and irrational social leaps and experiments. Whole

theories of human behavior and the occult are based upon these

foundations of sand.

Let’s be clear, though, about what I'm saying. Yes, there is

plenty of scientific evidence and results to talk about particles

and show what particles can do. But current quantum physics

and super-strings is a model or a construct. It is a vehicle on

which to drive forward; it is a frame on which to hang the

experimental results. There are better frames and better

vehicles. However, what quality of vehicle are we talking about

when we talk of quantum physics? The answer has to be a

unicycle.

In comparison, the amount of Rolls Royce genius that has been

repetitively ignored for at least the past hundred years by the

establishment, has been criminal. We had Maxwell and Faraday

in the 19th Century, Tesla and Brown in the early 20th Century

and De Palma in the 1990's. Also, a whole gaggle of others; all

these people knew how physics really worked and how to tap

into the really free energy of the cosmos in addition to

interplanetary space travel. Of course, this was all against the

wishes of the Einsteinian theorists and the oil companies.

But, if you thought that the problem was a modern one, well have

I got news for you. Having developed and rediscovered Tesla’s

Theory of Environmental Energy [1938] and how free energy

works, I studied the principles of philosophy of science, and

developed a new scientific world-view. I found ways to argue in

philosophy that could educate modern scientific thinkers away

from the paradoxes by using the same jargon that they use, but

in a different way.

I was trying to get them to adopt a ‘holistic’ approach. Boy, what

a waste of ten years that was. The cosmos runs on harmony,

resonance, musical scales, and the mathematics of wave theory

and ‘eightness’. It is definitely not a coincidence that the Chinese

I CHING symbolism is made up like it is, ancient mankind

allegedly flew ships through the sky called Vimanas. It is exactly

the same symbolism used inside every modern computer chip

renamed as Boolean Arithmetic.

So, there is the look of real antiquity about this truth, but it gets

worse. Having been an avid follower of the Chaos Theory

(coming out of the Santa Fe Institute), I noticed that one of the

fundamental natural laws that seemed to underpin the cosmos

(that nobody wanted to talk about), was ‘emergence’.

That ‘order emerges out of chaos’ was being proved on the

Santa Fe computers, and some conspiracy buffs will tell you that

it is also part of the motto of a very high Masonic degree. This

was the one connection no scientist was trained to ever want,

yet it was the key to understanding everything: unity, Tesla,

time-travel, anti-gravity, possibly even the soul and eternal life.

It was the very cornerstone of reality.

More shocks lay ahead for me, however. Taking a rummage

through a dusty old cupboard in the Edinburgh Theosophical

Society one day, I found this bundle of yellowed paper (dated

1920) with instructions to destroy in the event of the owner’s

death. It was an esoteric secret school Illuminati Degree. I

opened up the bundle with glee, but discovered to my horror

(well, it was for my ego), that in those pages was the theory that I

thought I had invented; the theory of ‘emergence,’ ‘threeness’

and harmony, based on Hindu and Sanskrit writings dating back

10,000 BC. [as; ‘Logos, Outpourings and Vehicles’. Vol 1 Secret

Doctrine, Blavatsky, HP, 1875, Madras]

As we all know, there is nothing new about real truth, but the

Illuminati Schools have been teaching the reality of science, free

energy and emergence to people for millennia. The Platonic and

Aristotelian school’s harmonic math briefly emerged into art

schools during the renaissance, but it never made it into science

and technology. If it had, we could all have been flying anti-

gravity machines in the 16th century---much like the technical

designs of the Vimanas of the ancient Hindus, which were

preserved in caves written on palm leaves. Presumably, after

some cataclysmic Earth change thousands of years BC, that

may have sunk what we think of as Atlantis and given the Sphinx

12000 year old water erosion..

The same theories written in Sanskrit have been re-invented time

and time again by bright human scholars. The recent spate of

really, (obviously) good theorists have come to grief looking for

peer acceptance and publication. People like; Peter Plichta

[1997] 'prime number code', Ray Tomes [1992] 'Tomes harmonic

theory on redshift], Frank Searle [1999], Townsend Brown [1935],

'bifield-Brown effect', and myself have tried till we're blue in the

face to get scientists to see sense and save the world with

sanity, as did Lord Kelvin in 1903 with his atomic vortex theory

and other late 19th Century contemporaries such as; Boyle [Gas

Laws], Hooper's etheric field theory of 1903.

Thankfully an American book deal obtained through the Internet

from the spirit of free enterprise published a version of my 'free

energy' paper in a 'conspiracist anthology' called 'The Universal

Seduction .com' in 2003 CE.

Many of us today are beguiled by the technological advances of

genetics and computers, maybe even satisfied that the pace of

medicine is just about holding back the tide of new super bugs.

Many of us are happy to listen to the great mathematician,

Stephen Hawkings, speculating badly that the unity will come to

physics in twenty years. We all know that’s a pretty safe thing to

say because we may have been hit by Earth changes before

then, and any cronies perpetuating the science conspiracy, will

have passed over before then, anyway.

The reality of the matter, though, is that the crop of modern

science gurus like Hawking and Dawkins do not give us the

truth. Whether they know the truth and are hiding it from us is

another story. If they were hiding this, they would be criminals

of civilization - stifling the young minds that could save our

planet.

However, maybe the basis of the matter is that they are merely

victims of bad peer and non-rigorous peer review.

The new theorists like Plichta, Tomes, Brown, and myself who

have come forward, can argue the most profound and real

scientific arguments, using the highest form of scientific

language and analysis and are willing to be proved wrong. We

satisfy all the criteria for good science: simplicity and prediction,

which is more than can be said for refuted theories like the ‘big

bang’ and super-strings.

Where, oh where, did we hear that reality is so difficult that it

needs incredible hyper-dimensional mathematics, and ivy towers

to even have the time and inclination to contemplate the

complexities? It is just not true that reality is intuitively complex.

Thousands of scientists, millions of hours, billions of dollars

have been spent, yet no results, no progress has been

forthcoming---just a beckoning Dark Age and a good mortgage.

Harmonic Continuum Theory - The New Physics and Cosmology by Andrew Hennessey.pdf

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: